{
  "blueprint": "status-page",
  "builder": "Claude, following the phase prompts in order (a fresh subagent per phase that saw only the spec and the build folder)",
  "testedSpecSha256": "b828a93131e54224cefa3f7bdd61aecbcac1db5406f9c5f611351291fc336b55",
  "reviewDate": "2026-11-03",
  "reviewMethod": "Playwright scripts (Chromium) clicked through the build as the named seed people and as a signed-out visitor and asserted on what was on screen, with direct requests where a check says the server must refuse something; outbox emails and their confirmation and unsubscribe links were read on Admin: Outbox, the every-minute job was run from the development \"Run scheduled job now\" control with the development clock, the monitor webhook was called from a separate cookie-less browser context with the URL and token shown on the Automation screen, and /history.atom and /api/v1/status.json were fetched and parsed. The run below is the single final run on a fresh database after all spec gaps were fixed, resetting to the seed before each phase's checks. Earlier per-phase runs found the gaps and are not counted. Results are final post-fix checks, not first-attempt success rates or an independent human audit.",
  "automatedTests": {
    "passed": 114,
    "total": 114,
    "command": "npm test",
    "rerunDuringReview": true
  },
  "gapsFixed": 58,
  "runs": [
    {
      "startedAt": "2026-11-03T10:13:17.393Z",
      "finishedAt": "2026-11-03T10:13:35.600Z",
      "phases": [
        1,
        2,
        3,
        4
      ],
      "passed": 18,
      "total": 18,
      "items": [
        {
          "phase": 1,
          "text": "The public page shows \"All systems operational\", the five components in their two groups, and 90-day uptime of 99.96% for API, 99.93% for Email delivery and 100.00% for the other three.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Banner \"All systems operational\"; groups {\"App\":[\"Dashboard\",\"API\",\"Webhooks\"],\"Delivery\":[\"Email delivery\",\"Payments\"]}; uptime {\"Dashboard\":\"100.00%\",\"API\":\"99.96%\",\"Webhooks\":\"100.00%\",\"Email delivery\":\"99.93%\",\"Payments\":\"100.00%\"}; 90 daily bars per component."
        },
        {
          "phase": 1,
          "text": "API's bar for 27 days before the seed day (Sep 18 in the examples) shows a major outage and links to INC-0013; Email delivery's bar for 13 days before (Oct 2) shows a partial outage.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Seed day 2026-11-03. API bar 2026-10-07: \"Wed, Oct 7, 2026 · Major outage · INC-0013 API errors for some requests\", links to /incidents/INC-0013 (clicked, opened INC-0013). Email delivery bar 2026-10-21: \"Wed, Oct 21, 2026 · Partial outage · INC-0014 Invoice emails delayed\". API has exactly one outage bar."
        },
        {
          "phase": 1,
          "text": "History lists INC-0014 and INC-0013 with every update in order, and the Database upgrade appears under upcoming maintenance.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "History: INC-0014 then INC-0013 (newest first), each with all four updates newest first (INC-0013 at 09:42, 09:30, 09:18, 09:00). Status page upcoming maintenance: \"Upcoming maintenance Database upgrade Scheduled When: Fri, Nov 6, 2026, 02:00 CST to 03:00 CST Affects: Dashboard, API We're upgrading our main database. The da\"."
        },
        {
          "phase": 1,
          "text": "Signed out, /admin asks for sign-in; signed in as Owen, Team and Settings are not offered, and direct requests to them are refused.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Signed out: /admin redirected to /sign-in asking to sign in; GET /admin/settings 303. As Owen: admin links Larkspur status, Dashboard, Incidents, Maintenance, Components and groups, Activity log, Outbox, Public page, New incident, From \"Elevated API errors\", From \"Email delays\", From \"Payments unavailable\" (no Team or Settings); GET /admin/team 403 \"Only admins can manage the team.\", GET /admin/settings 403, POST /admin/settings 403; page name unchanged."
        },
        {
          "phase": 2,
          "text": "Owen creates an incident from \"Elevated API errors\" and publishes it: it is numbered INC-0015, API shows partial outage and the banner reads \"Partial outage\".",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "From the dashboard link \"From \\\"Elevated API errors\\\"\" the editor filled title \"Elevated API error rates\" and API: Partial outage; Publish created INC-0015. Public page: API \"Partial outage\", banner \"Partial outage\"."
        },
        {
          "phase": 2,
          "text": "Using the clock: 10 minutes later Owen posts an Identified update setting API to major outage (the banner reads \"Major outage\"); 20 minutes after that he resolves it. API returns to operational and its uptime shows 99.94%.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "+10 minutes, Identified update with API Major outage: banner \"Major outage\", API \"Major outage\". +20 minutes (clock Tue, Nov 3, 2026, 04:43 CST), Resolve incident: API \"Operational\", banner \"All systems operational\", API uptime 99.94%."
        },
        {
          "phase": 2,
          "text": "Moving the clock to M-0003's start (02:00 CDT, 3 days after the seed day; Sunday Oct 18 in the examples) sets Dashboard and API to under maintenance and the banner to \"Under maintenance\". An incident setting API to partial outage then shows API as partial outage, and resolving it returns API to under maintenance. At 03:00 both return to operational and M-0003 shows completed.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Clock set to Fri, Nov 6, 2026, 02:00 CST: Dashboard \"Under maintenance\", API \"Under maintenance\", banner \"Under maintenance\". INC-0016 with API Partial outage: API \"Partial outage\", Dashboard \"Under maintenance\", banner \"Partial outage\". Resolved: API \"Under maintenance\". Clock Fri, Nov 6, 2026, 03:00 CST: Dashboard \"Operational\", API \"Operational\", banner \"All systems operational\"; admin shows \"M-0003 · Database upgrade Completed Fri Nov 6, 02:00 to 03:0\" and History lists it completed."
        },
        {
          "phase": 2,
          "text": "A published incident has no Delete action, and a direct delete request is refused; every change above appears in the Activity log with who did it, or \"schedule\".",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "INC-0015 admin page has no Delete button; POST /admin/incidents/INC-0015/delete returned 403 (\"INC-0015 is published, and published incidents can't be deleted.\") and the incident is still public. Activity log: Owen Price: Created draft INC-0015 \"Elevated API error rates\" from the template \"Elevated API errors\" | Owen Price: Published INC-0015 as investigating; API partial outage (notify on); 3 emails to subscribers | Owen Price: Posted an update (identified) to INC-0015; API major outage (notify on); 3 emails to subscribers | Owen Price: Resolved INC-0015; API operational; 3 emails to subscribers | schedule: Started M-0003 \"Database upgrade\"; Dashboard under maintenance, API under maintenance; 3 emails to subscribers | Owen Price: Published INC-0016 as investigating; API partial outage (notify on); 3 emails to subscribers | Owen Price: Resolved INC-0016; API under maintenance; 3 emails to subscribers | schedule: Completed M-0003 \"Database upgrade\"; Dashboard operational, API operational; 3 emails to subscribers."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "Subscribing new@example.com to API only puts a confirmation email in the outbox. Publishing an API incident before she confirms emails sam, lee and ana only; after she confirms, the next update also emails her.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Subscribe as visitor with API only: 1 new outbox email, to new@example.com, \"Confirm your subscription to Larkspur status\". Owen published INC-0015 (API partial outage, notify on): emails to ana@studio.example, lee@agency.example, sam@clientco.example (\"[Larkspur status] Investigating: API requests timing out\"). Visitor opened the confirmation link: \"You're subscribed new@example.com will get Larkspur status emails for: API. Manage your su\". Next update (Identified): emails to ana@studio.example, lee@agency.example, new@example.com, sam@clientco.example."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "Publishing an Email delivery incident emails sam, ana and jo, and not lee or max.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Owen published INC-0016 (Email delivery degraded performance, notify on): 3 emails, to ana@studio.example, jo@freelance.example, sam@clientco.example; none to lee@agency.example or max@pending.example."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "An update posted with notify off sends no email.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Identified update on INC-0016 with notify unchecked is on the public incident page; outbox count unchanged (14 before and after), 0 new emails."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "The unsubscribe link in an email works in one click, and that address gets nothing afterwards.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Opened the unsubscribe link from jo@freelance.example's email once, signed out: \"You're unsubscribed jo@freelance.example won't get any more emails from Larkspur status. Unsubscribe\". Then a Monitoring update and Resolve on INC-0016 emailed sam@clientco.example, ana@studio.example, sam@clientco.example, ana@studio.example; nothing to jo@freelance.example."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "A sixth subscribe attempt from the same IP address within an hour is refused.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "After +1 hour, five subscribe attempts (rate1 to rate5@example.com) were accepted and got confirmation emails; the sixth showed \"Too many subscribe attempts from your network: we allow 5 an hour. Try again in about 60 minutes.\"; a direct POST /subscribe then returned 429 (\"Too many subscribe attempts from your network: we allow 5 an hour. Try again in \"). No email for rate6 or rate7."
        },
        {
          "phase": 3,
          "text": "/history.atom lists INC-0013 and INC-0014, and /api/v1/status.json shows the overall status and each component's status, with no drafts and no subscriber data.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "/history.atom (200, application/atom+xml; charset=utf-8) has 5 entries including INC-0013 and INC-0014. /api/v1/status.json: overall_status \"partial_outage\", banner \"Partial outage\", components {\"Dashboard\":\"operational\",\"API\":\"partial_outage\",\"Webhooks\":\"operational\",\"Email delivery\":\"operational\",\"Payments\":\"operational\"}, Access-Control-Allow-Origin *. Neither contains draft INC-0017 (\"Secret draft about Payments\"), any subscriber address, team member name or token."
        },
        {
          "phase": 4,
          "text": "After a reset, a POST to Payments' automation URL with its token and {\"status\": \"major_outage\"} creates draft INC-0015 from \"Payments unavailable\" and emails Nadia, Owen and Ivy, and the public page does not change.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "POST /api/automation/cmp_payments with its X-Status-Token and {\"status\":\"major_outage\"}: 200 {\"ok\":true,\"ignored\":false,\"component\":\"Payments\",\"status\":\"major_outage\",\"previous\":\"operational\",\"auto_publish\":false,\"action\":\"draft_created\",\"incident\":\"INC. Admin shows \"INC-0015 · Payments unavailable Draft\" (draft, from the \"Payments unavailable\" template). Outbox: \"Monitor reports Payments: major outage (draft incident INC-0015)\" to ivy@larkspur.example, nadia@larkspur.example, owen@larkspur.example. Public page, /api/v1/status.json and /history.atom unchanged (banner \"All systems operational\", Payments \"Operational\"); /incidents/INC-0015 returns 404."
        },
        {
          "phase": 4,
          "text": "The same request with a wrong token returns 401 and changes nothing, and repeating the valid request does not create a second draft.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Wrong token: 401 {\"ok\":false,\"error\":\"Missing or wrong X-Status-Token header.\"}; no token: 401. No new emails, incidents list and public page unchanged. Repeating the valid request: 200 {\"ok\":true,\"ignored\":true,\"reason\":\"major_outage is the same as the last status reported.\",\"component\":\"Payments\",\"statu; still one draft (INC-0015, no INC-0016) and no new emails."
        },
        {
          "phase": 4,
          "text": "After another reset, with auto-publish on for Payments, the same request sets Payments to major outage and publishes the incident; a following {\"status\": \"operational\"} resolves it and returns Payments to operational.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Reset, Nadia turned on Auto-publish for Payments. major_outage report (200): public Payments \"Major outage\", banner \"Major outage\", /incidents/INC-0015 public: \"← Incident history Payments unavailable INC-0015 · Investigating · Impact: Major\". operational report (200): Payments \"Operational\", banner \"All systems operational\", INC-0015 shows Resolved."
        },
        {
          "phase": 4,
          "text": "A postmortem added to INC-0013 appears on its incident page below the updates and in /history.atom.",
          "status": "pass",
          "evidence": "Owen added a postmortem to INC-0013. Public /incidents/INC-0013 (signed out) shows it in the Postmortem section below all four updates (\"A configuration change lowered the database connection limit from 200 ...\"). The INC-0013 entry in /history.atom contains the postmortem text."
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "notTested": [
    "Production sign-in: company-domain one-time sign-in links were built, but every check used the development \"sign in as\" switcher.",
    "Real email delivery: incident, maintenance, confirmation and monitor-report emails were written to the outbox and logged, not sent; no email provider was configured, so bounces and retries were covered only by the build's own tests.",
    "The every-minute job on a real scheduler: it ran from \"Run scheduled job now\" with the development clock, not from a cron service calling /api/cron/every-minute.",
    "A real monitoring tool: the webhook was called by the test script, not by an uptime monitor.",
    "Visitors in other time zones: every check ran in America/Chicago; the seed's maintenance fell after daylight saving ended, so times read CST.",
    "Spec fixes that no acceptance check covers (status codes, caching, retries, the JSON field names, webhook errors) were written after the build; the test build handles these through its own choices.",
    "Hosting: the build ran on SQLite on one server, not on separate hosting from the product as section 3 recommends, and the 30-second production cache was not exercised."
  ]
}